Do we really need another reason to boot Burma (Myanmar) out of ASEAN?
Now reports are surfacing that the Burmese junta is recruiting child soldiers. This is because its adult soldiers have started deserting in large numbers, partly because they oppose the recent crackdown on Buddhist monks.
Now "recruiting" is a euphemism here, and I won't even use the word "conscripting". The children are usually abducted or threatened into joining the army. This is the worst kind of child abuse. So Malaysia, as a fellow ASEAN member, can be proudly associated with these despicable military leaders.
Don't forget about Malaysia's Petronas connection to Burma, which I wrote about previously.
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Sunday, October 21, 2007
Google steps up GMail gig race
Sometime in the past few days, when I wasn't looking, my GMail storage space raced past the 4GB mark. It had hit the 3GB mark only a week ago. GMail is falling behind some of its webmail competitors, some of which offer 5GB or more space.
So it seems that Google is stepping up the gig race, and is adding storage faster than its usual rate.
Update, Nov 17: Storage is now near the 5GB mark.
Sunday, October 07, 2007
Burma: The Petronas Connection
Despite all the noises that Malaysia is making about Burma's human rights record, the government has conveniently forgotten its embarrassing link to the Burmese military junta.
An article in The Sydney Morning Herald, titled Oil companies look to exploit Burma, reveals that companies like Petronas are more than willing to continue doing business with the military regime.
A piece in Times Online, Boycotting Burma makes things worse, also examines the history of Petronas' Burma stake. Apparently, it originates from Premier Oil, a British company which was pressured by the British government to pull out its investments from Burma a few years ago. Premier did just that in 2002, selling its investment in the Yetagun gasfield to Petronas.
An article in Time, titled Going nowhere, even provides a dollar amount:
"Two existing operations, one managed by France's Total and the other by Malaysian state oil company Petronas, provided Burma with about US$1 billion in revenues in 2005, estimates one energy consulting firm."
From the SMH article:
"France's Total SA and Malaysia's Petroliam Nasional Bhd, or Petronas, currently pump gas from fields off Burma's coast through a pipeline to Thailand, which takes 90% of Burma's gas output, according to Thailand's PTT Exploration & Production PLC.
But investing in Burma has brought accusations that petroleum corporations offer economic support to the country's repressive junta, and in some cases are complicit in human rights abuses.
The military's bloody clampdown on the protests this week have intensified calls from international activist groups for energy companies to pull out of the country.
"They are funding the dictatorship," said Marco Simons, US legal director at Earth Rights International, an environmental and human rights group with offices in Thailand and Washington. "The oil and gas companies have been one of the major industries keeping the regime in power."
Unsurprisingly, our local newspapers are silent on this issue, with the minor exception of The Star, which ran two readers' letters, but no actual reports:
1. Impose sanctions on oil and products
2. Put on hold business activities in Myanmar
Now, Petronas is mainly government-owned, and by extension, public-owned so this can be interpreted as the Malaysian public giving support to the Myanmar military regime.
Petronas' continued investment in Burma, and continued payment of millions to the army diminishes Malaysia's stance on this issue, and opens us to accusations of hypocrisy and exploitation.
An article in The Sydney Morning Herald, titled Oil companies look to exploit Burma, reveals that companies like Petronas are more than willing to continue doing business with the military regime.
A piece in Times Online, Boycotting Burma makes things worse, also examines the history of Petronas' Burma stake. Apparently, it originates from Premier Oil, a British company which was pressured by the British government to pull out its investments from Burma a few years ago. Premier did just that in 2002, selling its investment in the Yetagun gasfield to Petronas.
An article in Time, titled Going nowhere, even provides a dollar amount:
"Two existing operations, one managed by France's Total and the other by Malaysian state oil company Petronas, provided Burma with about US$1 billion in revenues in 2005, estimates one energy consulting firm."
From the SMH article:
"France's Total SA and Malaysia's Petroliam Nasional Bhd, or Petronas, currently pump gas from fields off Burma's coast through a pipeline to Thailand, which takes 90% of Burma's gas output, according to Thailand's PTT Exploration & Production PLC.
But investing in Burma has brought accusations that petroleum corporations offer economic support to the country's repressive junta, and in some cases are complicit in human rights abuses.
The military's bloody clampdown on the protests this week have intensified calls from international activist groups for energy companies to pull out of the country.
"They are funding the dictatorship," said Marco Simons, US legal director at Earth Rights International, an environmental and human rights group with offices in Thailand and Washington. "The oil and gas companies have been one of the major industries keeping the regime in power."
Unsurprisingly, our local newspapers are silent on this issue, with the minor exception of The Star, which ran two readers' letters, but no actual reports:
1. Impose sanctions on oil and products
2. Put on hold business activities in Myanmar
Now, Petronas is mainly government-owned, and by extension, public-owned so this can be interpreted as the Malaysian public giving support to the Myanmar military regime.
Petronas' continued investment in Burma, and continued payment of millions to the army diminishes Malaysia's stance on this issue, and opens us to accusations of hypocrisy and exploitation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)